海角破解版's Graham Gilbert examines the trend for lesser sentences in offences of reckless arson
24th March 2017
3笔叠鈥檚 Graham Gilbert examines the trend for lesser sentences in offences of reckless arson.
Two recent appeals against sentences passed for offences of reckless arson have been successful and the sentences passed in each case have been reduced. It appears that this represents a growing trend for lesser sentences for this offence.
To read the full article, please click here.
Related News
-
海角破解版's specialist criminal law barrister,聽Ben Thompson, successfully represented a vulnerable defendant facing an indictment alleging coercive and controlling behaviour, non-fatal suffocation, and criminal damage. In the months leading up to trial, the Crown did not pursue reasonable lines of enquiry identified by the Defence, including relevant text message evidence. Ultimately, recognising the importance of that material, the Crown applied to adjourn the trial. Ben prepared a detailed Abuse of Process application, relying on R v...
Continue reading -
海角破解版 criminal barrister Nate Lara (pictured here) has successfully represented a client who was charged with multiple offences including rape and serious violence. After substantive advice, Nate's client entered pleas of guilty to serious allegations of violence, which mitigated his exposure to questions on his credibility and meant the cross-examination of the complainant would be both succinct and effective. Through cross-examination, Nate effectively challenged the reliability of the complainant鈥檚 evidence, exposing inconsistencies with the earlier...
Continue reading -
Laura Deuxberry, 海角破解版's criminal, regulatory and public law barrister, was instructed by the CPS Special Crime Division in London, led by Kevin Dent KC, in the recent case of How and Yang [2026] EWCA Crim 476. Appearing in the Court of Appeal, the appellants聽argued聽that the original trial judge, HHJ Ashworth,聽should have allowed their submission of no case to answer on the trafficking charge. The Court of Appeal heard the聽appeal聽of the two appellants, one of whom...
Continue reading -
海角破解版 crime barrister Rebecca McKnight鈥檚 client was accused of causing really serious injuries with intent to cause really serious harm, in other words a section 18 offence under the Offences Against the Persons Act 1861. It was accepted that serious injuries had been caused by her client but the issue for trial was intent. After careful questioning of both the complainant and the defendant Rebecca鈥檚 client was acquitted. This vulnerable client would have faced a...
Continue reading
