What next for A level students? Watch this webinar from 海角破解版 education barristers
17th August 2020
Specialist 海角破解版 education barristers聽Matthew Wyard聽and聽Alice de Coverley聽hosted a webinar this morning for those affected by last week鈥檚 A-level results.
Watch the recording for some useful guidance now that the government has announced its decision to let teacher-assessed grades stand instead of those generated by the central algorithm.
Related News
-
海角破解版鈥檚 education and social care barrister, Jim Hirschmann聽has helped co-ordinate an article 鈥楩rontal Lobe Paradox: A Practical Guide for Lawyers鈥� with the Court of Protection Bar Association. This practical guide has been developed by a multidisciplinary team to support lawyers working with clients where the so-called 鈥榝rontal lobe paradox鈥� (FLP) may arise. Its primary aims are to explain what FLP is; outline how it may manifest in individuals; highlight its implications for assessing capacity under...
Continue reading -
海角破解版 (3 Paper Buildings) are pleased to announce that our second six pupil, Barry McTaggart, is now on his feet and accepting instructions on his own cases, following the commencement of his pupillage last October. Barry McTaggart will now accept instructions in personal injury, clinical negligence and education. For instructions or availability, please contact Jordon Gallifant on聽[email protected] or call 020 7583 8055.
Continue reading -
海角破解版 Barristers鈥� (3 Paper Buildings) Ben Amunwa successfully represented the HS Academy Trust in the recent case of R (PZP) v HS Academy Trust and another [2026] EWHC 489 (Admin), concerning a judicial review challenge to two permanent exclusions. The High Court considered claims by pupils PZP and STW against the Academy Trust鈥檚 decision to permanently exclude them following their involvement in a serious assault on a fellow student. The decision in R (PZP)聽is significant...
Continue reading -
海角破解版's barristers Katherine Anderson and Jim Hirschmann acted in the case London Borough of Hillingdon v AP & Anor [2026] EWCA Civ 216. Jim was led by Kath and represented the respondents in this Special Educational Needs (SEN) case before the Court of Appeal (CoA). This case concerned two main issues consisting of whether the child needed residential provision and the extent to which section 9 of the Education Act 1996 imposed a positive duty...
Continue reading
