Clerk Details
- Clerk Name: Stuart Pringle
- Clerk Telephone: 0330 332 2633
- Clerk Email: [email protected]
Financial Crime incl Fraud POCA
Nick has defended individuals and organisations in multi-million-pound mortgage fraud, conspiracy to defraud, rogue trader prosecutions, and regulatory investigations brought by government departments. He has a proven record of exposing disclosure failures and prosecutorial misconduct 鈥 including cases where officers in charge have misled prosecution counsel and concealed unused material, resulting in entire multi-defendant prosecutions collapsing. His pre-charge work in fraud investigations has prevented prosecution entirely. He accepts 海角破解版 instructions in fraud cases and can advise from the earliest stage of an investigation.
Selected Cases
R v AP (Operation Ringwood) 鈥 Pre-charge (2019鈥2022) Pension liberation fraud investigation by Dorset Police. Direct access. Nick represented the client throughout, including advising in relation to Restraint proceedings. Following three years of investigation, the Crown took no further action in October 2022. A clear example of specialist pre-charge advice preventing prosecution entirely.
R v A & Others 鈥 (2021) Defence of company and individual defendants charged with criminal offences arising from alleged breaches of planning enforcement notices. Nick negotiated an out of court settlement, and the prosecution offered no evidence on all charges.
R v JW and Others 鈥 (2019) Seven-defendant rogue trader conspiracy targeting a vulnerable, partially sighted victim in Bournemouth. The group repeatedly attended the victim's home, posing as tradesmen and officials, and defrauded him over a sustained period. Nick's client was the only defendant acquitted; all six co-defendants were convicted and sentenced to between 21 months and three years and four months' imprisonment. Reported:
R v AP and others 鈥 Winchester Crown Court (2015) Multi-defendant fraud prosecution (75 charges; five defendants) brought by the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills. The officer in charge had misled prosecution counsel and concealed disclosure, and the officer in charge and disclosure officer were the same person contrary to the Attorney General's Code of Practice. Fresh review uncovered further suppressed material. Both trials collapsed. All defendants including Nick鈥檚 client AP were formally acquitted of all charges. High-profile case involving Richard Carr. Reported: .
R v JH and others 鈥 (2015) Eleven-defendant 拢4 million mortgage fraud 鈥 fabricated occupations and incomes used to obtain mortgages on multiple properties. Nick's client acquitted on two of three counts; 12-month sentence suspended for two years on the third. Co-defendants sentenced to between two and a half and four years' imprisonment. Reported:
R v SM 鈥 (2015) Handling stolen goods 鈥 proceeds of an insider fraud against a multinational company. Following disclosure applications, it emerged that the employer's investigator had coerced, pressured, and intimidated the defendant 鈥 a young woman of good character 鈥 into confessing, having promised there would be no police involvement if she admitted the offences. The employer broke that promise and the Crown prosecuted. Nick's abuse of process application succeeded after contested findings of fact (the investigator denied making the promises); the Crown offered no evidence.
-
Recommendations Chambers & Partners Rankings (2019鈥2026)
Chambers UK 2026 / Crime 鈥 Western Bar > 鈥淣icholas is a dynamic barrister. He is calm, sympathetic and gives a huge amount of effort to every case. He is a strong and persuasive advocate with an eye for persuasive arguments.鈥Chambers UK 2025 / Crime 鈥 Western Bar > 鈥淗e has a great practice.鈥 > 鈥淗e is a smooth advocate who has a great way of speaking to the jury.鈥
Chambers UK 2024 / Crime 鈥 Western Bar > 鈥淗e is highly effective and highly skilled in all aspects of criminal defence work.鈥 > 鈥淐lients love Nicholas. He鈥檚 a very good lawyer and a persuasive advocate.鈥 > 鈥淣icholas handled the cross-examination deftly but devastatingly. His ability to juggle disclosure requests, client management and legal arguments is remarkable.鈥
Chambers UK 2023 / Crime 鈥 Western Bar > 鈥淗e has a very client-centred approach.鈥 > 鈥淗is advocacy skills are impressive.鈥 > 鈥淣ick is an industrious individual.鈥
Chambers UK 2022 / Crime 鈥 Western Bar > 鈥淗as a very positive attitude and his written work is excellent.鈥 > 鈥淗e has an approach and flair which juries like.鈥
Chambers UK 2021 / Crime 鈥 Western Bar > 鈥淗e has a very good reputation and his written work is of the highest quality.鈥
Chambers UK 2020 / Crime 鈥 Western Bar > 鈥淗e is both responsive and proactive, and his advocacy skills are fantastic.鈥
Chambers UK 2019 / Crime 鈥 Western Bar > 鈥淗e is both responsive and proactive, and his advocacy skills are fantastic.鈥
Legal 500 Rankings (2011鈥2026)
Legal 500 2026 / Crime 鈥 Western Circuit > 鈥淣ick is a good barrister. He is always well-prepared and will fight his corner as required.鈥Legal 500 2025 / Crime 鈥 Western Circuit > 鈥淣ick is a committed, highly competent and effective criminal barrister. He is an effective trial advocate who gets good results, and his pleas in mitigation are always carefully constructed with great preparation.鈥
Legal 500 2024 / Crime 鈥 Western Circuit > 鈥淣ick is diligent and always enthusiastic about his work. His written work is of the highest quality. He is also a very persuasive and effective advocate.鈥
Legal 500 2023 / Crime 鈥 Western Circuit > 鈥Nick is a top level operator. A first-class and fearless advocate with a very robust and incisive approach to criminal litigation. An exceptional strategist.鈥
Legal 500 2022 / Crime 鈥 Western Circuit > 鈥淣ick鈥檚 strengths are his intelligence, his ability to fully engage with a jury and his thorough preparation.鈥
Legal 500 2020鈥21 / Crime 鈥 Western Circuit > 鈥淎 criminal defence specialist.鈥
Legal 500 2018鈥19 / Crime 鈥 Western Circuit 鈥 Tier 1 > 鈥淎n expert in defending in serious crime cases.鈥
Legal 500 2017 / Crime 鈥 Western Circuit > 鈥淪elf-assured and dedicated.鈥
Legal 500 2016 / Crime 鈥 Western Circuit > 鈥淓xtremely diligent in his approach to cases.鈥
Legal 500 2015 / Crime 鈥 Western Circuit > 鈥淜nown for his defence work in the Crown Court, and his practice has an emphasis on serious crime.鈥
Legal 500 2014 / Crime 鈥 Western Circuit > 鈥淗e specialises in sexual offence cases, particularly those involving children and historical allegations of misconduct.鈥
Legal 500 2013 / Crime 鈥 Western Circuit > 鈥淎 very confident and knowledgeable advocate.鈥
Nick was also recommended by the Legal 500 for 2011 and 2012.
Judicial Commendations
Court of AppealR v Hitchings [2024] EWCA Crim 1003 鈥 Stuart-Smith LJ, Stacey J, HHJ Conrad KC: 鈥The Court is grateful to Mr Robinson鈥 for the high quality of his written submissions.鈥
R v Sherriff [2012] EWCA Crim 2381 鈥 Lord Justice Aikens: 鈥淢r Robinson presented the arguments very concisely, clearly and persuasively.鈥
R v Kluver [2010] EWCA Crim 3237 鈥 Lord Justice Moses: 鈥There is ample authority for the proposition that counsel for the defence has so skilfully identified both in his written grounds and in his oral submissions and we are indebted to Mr Robinson for them.鈥
R v Bennett [2010] EWCA Crim 1032 鈥 Mr Justice Davis: 鈥Mr Robinson, on behalf of the Appellant, has put the case very well.鈥
R v Woodcock [2011] EWCA Crim 1347 鈥 Mr Justice Blair: 鈥It is submitted by Mr Robinson, who has argued this case well for the applicant, that this is excessive.鈥
R v Knight [2013] EWCA Crim 2486 鈥 Fulford J: > 鈥渄etailed and able鈥
Crown Court
Mr Recorder Don Tait, following the acquittal of his client (R v RC 鈥 Crown Court, 2016), in open court: 鈥淢r Robinson you did an excellent job defending this man. You very skillfully revealed all of the inadequacies in this investigation鈥.
Instructing Solicitor Testimonials
鈥淭ruly grateful for your proactive case management, first class professionalism and dedication.鈥鈥淭his was a difficult case in one sense and your efforts and assistance went beyond the call of duty. I very much appreciate it.鈥
鈥淧lease accept my heartfelt thanks and appreciation for all your incredible and excellent hard work on this firm鈥檚 cases and for always doing over and above what is required in every matter that you deal with. Not only that, well done on all of your outstanding results and faultless client care!鈥
鈥淭hank you Nick, I am very grateful for your assistance. Your professionalism and support is unbelievable.鈥
鈥淔ine work. Very fine work indeed. That was mission impossible. I am genuinely very impressed with that result.鈥
Lay Client (defendant鈥檚 father)
"I had the pleasure of watching Nick during the trial and cannot praise sufficiently the way he handled the case. He was the perfect professional and we all felt our case couldn't have been in better or more capable hands. As the day progressed it looked increasingly certain that a custodial sentence would follow, and the judge intimated as much. However, Nick's response was totally stunning. He spoke calmly, quietly, slowly but with an air of total credibility 鈥 and when the judge interjected, he gently responded with additional information. He retained sufficient material to respond to each of the judge's concerns. If it had been a dramatic performance there would have been applause at the end. He is a real credit to his profession."
Lay Client
"I write to you聽to express my sincere gratitude about a member of your Chambers Mr Robinson who defended me at trial聽鈥β燭he case required complete concentration and an eye for detail. This worried me as being on legal aid I thought I might not receive the same service as a client paying privately. This wasn鈥檛 the case at all and in fact the complete opposite. Mr Robinson genuinely cared about his client and even spent time to reassure my co-defendant聽鈥β燚uring the trial Mr Robinson鈥檚 charisma was a breath of fresh air; he kept the Jury on their toes and concentrated throughout and also he was very calming during the breaks when tensions were high.聽Finally Mr Robinson鈥檚 closing speech was聽mesmerising聽and got across every possible point I could think of and more. I knew after his speech there was no way I would be convicted. I feel in debt to this man and feel that the literature in my email doesn鈥檛 allow me to explain my true gratitude."
Lay Client
鈥淛ust wanted to express my thanks, for the confident, reassuring and supportive way that Mr Robinson has handled my case. At short notice he has been able to defend me to his confident best.聽 His caring and clear way in which he dealt with me and my family and friends was top notch鈥.
Lay Client (海角破解版)
"Nick - I'm eternally indebted to you and will never be able to thank you enough for today's outcome 鈥 thank you from the bottom of my heart for all you have done for me. You've given me my life back鈥.
Lay client鈥檚 grandparent
"I would also like to say a speci铿乧 thank you for bringing Nicholas Robinson in as L's barrister. L felt very comfortable talking to Nick, and Nick, in turn, put L at ease. The relationship barristers have with their client, the trust and con铿乨ence in the barrister's ability is paramount, and we certainly had that with Nick. I think it also proved that a barristers relationship with his counterparts on the other side is also important and in our case this de铿乶itely proved to be significant鈥.
Lay Client (defendant鈥檚 mother)
鈥淵our preparation was meticulous, your manner was calm under pressure, and your advocacy was outstanding鈥 You also showed such patience and understanding with [our son]. He has a lot of difficulty, and you never let that become an obstacle. You took the time to explain things clearly to him and treated him with real respect, which meant the world to us as a family.鈥